Darren Woods

CEo of ExxonMobil

As CEO of ExxonMobil, Darren Woods plays an active role in a slew of crimes against the Earth. ExxonMobil is responsible for 2.8% of all global CO2 emissions between 1854 and 2022. Woods is guilty of quid pro quo campaign financing, suing activist investors who demanded climate action, displacing the blame for climate change onto consumers, greenwashing Exxon’s corporate image, and lying to Congress about Exxon’s past of misleading the public about what Exxon knew about climate change since the 1970s. The range of Darren Woods’s alleged climate crimes is long.

  • Birthday: January 12, 1965 

    Hometown: Wichita, Kansas

    Primary residence: Dallas, Texas

    Current role: Executive Chair and CEO of ExxonMobil (2017-present)

    Salary: $36.9 million in 2023

    Net Worth: an estimated $186 million 

    Education: 

    • BS in electrical engineering from Texas A&M University

    • MBA from Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Management 

    Board memberships, affiliations, and roles:

    • Woods has worked for Exxon since 1992

    • Committee member of the American Petroleum Institute

    • Trustee of the Center for Strategic and International Studies 

    • Member of the National Petroleum Council 

    • Member of Business Roundtable

    • Member of the Business Council 

    • Board member of the US-China Business Council

    Past roles: 

    • Chairman of the American Petroleum Institute (unknown-2020) 

    • Member of Texas A&M University Engineering Advisory Council

    • Board member of Saudi Aramco Mobil Refinery Company Ltd. 

    • Director of Imperial Oil (2013-2014)

    Fun facts: 

  • Darren Woods and other corporate CEOs like him aren’t flashy or exciting villains. They don’t wear scary masks, they wear expensive suits. They don’t often make front-page news, their crimes begin in board rooms. It’s hard to pinpoint their exact victims because their crimes are omnipresent and global. 

    The Nation described the corporate world in which Exxon operates as “Orwellian” – the company blatantly doublespeaks as it simultaneously pledges to eliminate its carbon emissions by 2050 and dramatically ramps up its oil and gas production. 


    Continued Expansion of Fossil Fuels

    • ExxonMobil is relentlessly doubling down its fossil fuel production and expanding its empire. In ExxonMobil’s 2023 Annual Report, Woods boasts: “Our industry leadership extends to our record annual production in Guyana and the Permian and the continued strengthening of our already advantaged portfolio through divestments, acquisitions, and investments.” 

    • In May 2024, it acquired Pioneer Natural Resources for $60 billion, which doubled its hydrocarbon production in Texas’s Permian Basin. This deal is effectively a huge bet on the future of fossil fuel production in the US, revealing that Exxon doesn’t see fossil fuel output decreasing in the years to come. This is ExxonMobil’s biggest deal since Exxon and Mobil merged in 1998. Woods is attempting to spin this deal that is predicated on expanding fossil fuel infrastructure as something good for the planet by stating that ExxonMobil will expedite “Pioneer’s 2050 net-zero Permian goal to a 2035 plan.”

    • According to David Tong for Oil Change International, “ExxonMobil expanding is bad for people, communities, and our climate…Further consolidation of the fossil energy market into a smaller number of mega companies will not secure energy access for people or help achieve climate targets.”

    • In March 2024, ExxonMobil received a grade of “G” and was one of the lowest-ranked companies by Carbon Tracker for its misalignment with the goals of the Paris Agreement. 


    Lying to Congress About What Exxon Knew

    • In 2021, Woods was accused of lying under oath during a congressional hearing investigating the oil industry’s decade-long disinformation campaign to prevent climate action. Woods declined to make a specific pledge and to stop lobbying on climate initiatives. Rep. Carolyn Malone, Chairwoman of the House Oversight Committee, pressed Woods on whether or not his predecessor, Lee Raymond, spread doubt about climate science despite clear internal evidence. Woods denied that Raymond misled the public, and he denied that there were any inconsistencies between Exxon’s public-facing narrative and what Exxon scientists told top Exxon executives. The opposite is true: since the 1970s, ExxonMobil’s internal climate company memos and climate models showed that they knew their fossil fuel products would lead to global warming and other environmental impacts. 


    Blaming Consumers

    • Darren Woods has recognized publicly that we’re off track to meet climate change mitigation goals, but, instead of taking responsibility for his company’s leading role in causing climate change, he has tried to displace the blame onto consumers. 

    • In March 2024, Woods said, “The dirty secret nobody talks about is how much all this is going to cost and who’s willing to pay for it. The people who are generating those emissions need to be aware of and pay the price for generating those emissions. That is ultimately how you solve the problem.”

    • The emissions that Woods is referring to are called “Scope 3” emissions and are those that are released when oil and gas are burned by consumers. Activist investor groups have pushed oil companies like Exxon to track, publish, and reduce these Scope 3 emissions, but, according to Grist, Exxon prefers to focus on Scope 1 emissions (those that are released directly from oil rigs and power plants) and Scope 2 (fuel and electricity used to operate machinery and offices). According to the SEC, Exxon’s Scope 3 emissions in 2019 were “greater than any other major Western oil company, and similar to the GHG emissions of the entire country of Canada.”

    • Exxon has a vested interest in limiting the scope of the emissions for which they can be held responsible, and this skirting of responsibility is unacceptable: Darren Woods must take responsibility for his climate crimes instead of blaming his victims. 

    • This scope limitation builds on Exxon’s history of blaming the public for the climate crisis. In 2021, a team of researchers at Harvard used machine learning and computational linguistics to analyze the language of half a century’s worth of content written by ExxonMobil. They found that the company used subtle rhetorical techniques to displace the blame for climate change onto the public. In internal communication and academic papers, Exxon recognized the link between their products and global warming, but in public-facing content, they were more focused on “consumers” and “demand.” 

    • Darren Woods continues perpetrating this individualistic framing to save face, deflect responsibility, and conduct business as usual. 


    Suing Activist Shareholders

    • In early 2024, ExxonMobil announced it was suing two of its activist investors, Arjuna Capital and Follow This, who supported a proposal for Exxon to accelerate its carbon reduction plan and expand the scope of its measured emissions to include suppliers and customers. Exxon claimed this proposal was designed to diminish the company’s existing business and micromanage its operations. The proposal was dropped, but Exxon pushed forward with its lawsuit. This persistence reveals a desire to prevent investors from speaking out against the corporation in the future and is an aggressive escalation of tactics in the fight against investors who are trying to push fossil fuel companies away from their business model focused on short-term profits.

    • Attorneys from Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher are arguing the case (Ted Boutrous, another 2024 Climate Criminal, works at this firm). 


    Racial and Environmental Justice Concerns

    • In 2021, As You Sow published a scorecard ranking the S&P 500 companies on their racial equity and environmental racism performances, and ExxonMobil ranked dead last, with a -23% score. 

    • ExxonMobil’s crude oil refinery in Beaumont, Texas, has consistently failed to comply with the Clean Air Act, posing major environmental health risks in the neighboring majority-Black area.  

    • Exxon has also been criticized for its unauthorized pollution and dangerous working conditions at its Baytown Refinery in Texas.

    • In 2023, Woods’ salary was $36.9 million, and his net worth was an estimated $186 million, with more than $20 million in liquid assets (WealthX).

    • Exxon uses at least 3 private jets, and top executives have been criticized for using them for personal travel. 

    • Woods received the 2023 CME STEM Leadership Honoree for Corporate Reinvention (but not without an interruption by Climate Defiance). 

    • Texas A&M awarded Woods the Outstanding Alumni Honor Award in 2023. 

  • ExxonMobil is involved in many parts of the fossil fuel commodity chain. Upstream, ExxonMobil works to discover and develop new oil and natural gas resources. As of 2023, it had oil operations in Guyana, Papua New Guinea, Mozambique, Australia, Qatar, and the United States in places such as the Permian Basin. ExxonMobil is the world’s largest downstream and chemical company. Its “Product Solutions” business manufactures fuels, lubricants, films, and materials for plastics, cars, and other consumer products. Its “Energy Products” portfolio “delivered record global refining throughput in 2023,” and its expansion of a refinery in Beaumont, Texas was the “largest increase in U.S. refining capacity in more than a decade.” 

    ExxonMobil has a Low Carbon Solutions business with a strategy “geared toward ensuring strong returns with a focus on carbon capture and storage, hydrogen, lower-emission fuels, and lithium.” Exxon has invested $17 billion in this low-carbon business. The International Energy Agency claimed that wide-scale carbon capture as a way to fight climate change was an “illusion.” 

    In the past, ExxonMobil has been called out for its explicit plans to increase annual CO2 emissions. For example, in 2020, Bloomberg analyzed internal documents that revealed Exxon’s plans to increase its annual emissions “by as much as the output of the entire national of Greece.” These emissions estimates predated Covid’s impacts on the global oil industry, but they nonetheless reveal Exxon’s knowing emissions increases. 

    ExxonMobil relies on the shaky semantics that fossil fuel emissions are the cause of climate change, not fossil fuels themselves. Exxon believes it can keep increasing its fossil fuel production, as long as its emissions are cleaned up using false solutions to climate change like carbon capture. 


    Read ExxonMobil’s 2023 Sustainability Report’s Executive Summary here. The phrase “climate change” is mentioned only once, in a “Forward-Looking Statement Warning” on the last page that functions as a legal disclaimer saying that ExxonMobil’s participation or membership in groups with climate-related goals “is not a promise or guarantee that ExxonMobil’s individual ambitions, future performance or policies will align with the collective ambitions of the organizations or the individual ambitions of other participants, all of which are subject to a variety of uncertainties and other factors, many of which may be beyond ExxonMobil’s control.”

  • ExxonMobil is infamous for its climate crimes and is widely – and fervently – condemned. According to Juan Cole for Common Dreams, “[ExxonMobil] are the most evil human beings to walk the earth since Homo Sapiens emerged in southern Africa around 200,000 years ago.” 

    Darren Woods has been personally called out as a climate criminal on multiple occasions. He was listed on The Guardian’s 2021 “Dirty Dozen” list of climate villains, and the Union of Concerned Scientists put out a “Wanted” poster for Woods to answer for ExxonMobil’s climate disinformation campaigns.


    In December 2023, Climate Defiance interrupted the Chemical Marketing & Economics gala in New York City when Woods was about to receive a “STEM leadership award” for “harnessing the transformative power of chemistry to advance humanity.” Climate Defiance activists stormed the stage with a banner saying “EAT SHIT DARREN.” An activist declared: “Darren Woods is a climate criminal. How can scientists be honoring this man who increases production of oil and gas every year? As long as production goes up, Darren, we’re fucked. We’re fucked because of you.” The activists were ushered off the stage to the sound of their chants: “Exxon lies and people die.” 

    Clean Creatives, an organization urging PR companies to cut their ties with the fossil fuel industry, ran a campaign in November 2021 called #EdelmanDropExxon. 


    In San Francisco in November 2023, hundreds of climate activists protested outside where Woods was giving a speech at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperative (APEC) summit. The activists were criticizing APEC leaders for giving Exxon an international platform. The activists also denounced Citibank for helping to finance Exxon’s $60 billion deal to acquire Pioneer Resources and double down on its fossil fuel production in the West Texas oil fields. 


    Some of Exxon’s shareholders are announcing their opposition to the company as well. At the annual shareholder meeting in May 2024, The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) expressed their opposition to Woods and the board of directors due to their lawsuit against activist shareholders. According to Forbes, “the ongoing conflict between Exxon and the pension funds epitomizes the broader struggle between corporate entities and public pension funds over the politicization of shareholder activism.”

    Darren Woods has been personally called out as a climate criminal on multiple occasions. He was listed on The Guardian’s 2021 “Dirty Dozen” list of climate villains, and the Union of Concerned Scientists put out a “Wanted” poster for Woods to answer for ExxonMobil’s climate disinformation campaigns.

    In December 2023, Climate Defiance interrupted the Chemical Marketing & Economics gala in New York City when Woods was about to receive a “STEM leadership award” for “harnessing the transformative power of chemistry to advance humanity.” Climate Defiance activists stormed the stage with a banner saying “EAT SHIT DARREN.” An activist declared: “Darren Woods is a climate criminal. How can scientists be honoring this man who increases production of oil and gas every year? As long as production goes up, Darren, we’re fucked. We’re fucked because of you.” The activists were ushered off the stage to the sound of their chants: “Exxon lies and people die.” 

    Clean Creatives, an organization urging PR companies to cut their ties with the fossil fuel industry, ran a campaign in November 2021 called #EdelmanDropExxon. 

    In San Francisco in November 2023, hundreds of climate activists protested outside where Woods was giving a speech at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperative (APEC) summit. The activists were criticizing APEC leaders for giving Exxon an international platform. The activists also denounced Citibank for helping to finance Exxon’s $60 billion deal to acquire Pioneer Resources and double down on its fossil fuel production in the West Texas oil fields. 

    Some of Exxon’s shareholders are announcing their opposition to the company as well. At the annual shareholder meeting in May 2024, The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) expressed their opposition to Woods and the board of directors due to their lawsuit against activist shareholders. According to Forbes, “the ongoing conflict between Exxon and the pension funds epitomizes the broader struggle between corporate entities and public pension funds over the politicization of shareholder activism.” 

    • “When are people going to be willing to pay for carbon reduction? We have opportunities to make fuels with lower carbon in it, but people aren’t willing to spend the money to do that.” – Woods, 2024

    • “We want to cater to the shareholders who are real investors, who have an interest in seeing this company succeed in generating return on their investments,” … “We don’t feel a responsibility to activists that hijack that process…and frankly, abuse it to advance an ideology.” –Woods, 2024

    • “I know how this information looks–when taken out of context, it seems bad.” –Woods, 2023

    • “The dirty secret nobody talks about is how much all this is going to cost and who’s willing to pay for it,” … “The people who are generating those emissions need to be aware of and pay the price for generating those emissions. That is ultimately how you solve the problem.” –Woods, 2024

    • “I think every piece of this business is exciting. The way that we approach our business, the ethics that we bring, the standards that we hold ourselves to … we do things the right  way for the right reasons, and I love that about our company.” – Woods, 2023.

    • “We leaned in when others leaned out, bucking conventional wisdom” – Woods, 2023 to his investors, praising his company’s continued and expanded fossil fuel production.

Connections within the Polluter Industrial Complex

What is the Polluter Industrial Complex?

  • COP28 Attendance

    • United Nations Conference of Parties, or “COPs”, are supposed to be an opportunity for governments to discuss how to mitigate and prepare for climate change. Despite this goal, there were 2,456 fossil fuel representatives at COP28 in 2023 – nearly four times higher than ever before. Among these fossil fuel representatives was Darren Woods, whose debut attendance had an insidious goal. According to ExxonKnews, Woods’s goal was “to defend the continued expansion of fossil fuel production against the irrefutable scientific consensus calling for its end.” Woods’s inclusion in COP28 gave him the platform to defend his company to the world, redirect the blame from Exxon’s production to consumers’ usage, and advertise Exxon’s carbon capture contracts. 

    • Considering that the president of COP28 was Sultan Al Jaber, the head of the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, it is not a huge surprise that Woods was welcomed into the conversation, but it is disappointing and troubling nonetheless. According to Collin Rees from Oil Change International, “treating [oil executives] as legitimate partners in the energy transition is dangerous,” especially considering their “long history of nothing but delay and doubling down on their core business model of expanding fossil fuels.”

    Quid pro quo campaign finance

    • On April 11, 2024, Donald Trump hosted an “Energy Round Table” for 20 top fossil fuel executives in Mar-a-Lago. At this meeting, Trump asked the group to raise $1 billion to help him win the election. In return, he promised to reverse Biden’s environmental policies and prevent new ones from passing. Essentially, Trump proposed a blatantly transactional deal: you give me money, and I’ll help you keep profiting off fossil fuels

    • Darren Woods was one of these 20 executives. The House Committee on Oversight and Accountability wrote Woods a letter requesting information about this quid pro quo proposal, saying it raised “significant potential ethical, campaign finance, and legal issues that would flow from the effective sale of American energy and regulatory policy to commercial interests in return for large campaign contributions.” 

    • As of May during the 2024 election cycle, the fossil fuel industry had already given $7.3 million to Trump’s campaign and related groups (compared to $186,000 for Biden). ExxonMobil gave $34,323 to Trump’s campaign in 2024, $72,440 to the National Republican Senatorial Committee, and $37,024 to the National Republican Congressional Committee. 

    Funding the attack on democratic institutions

    • According to the Global Center for Climate Justice, since the January 6 insurrection, along with other top fossil fuel companies, ExxonMobil has contributed to the “nearly $700,000 campaign and leadership PACs of the 147 Republican members of Congress who voted against certifying the election and continue to propagate the Big Lie that led to the attack.” Valero Energy, Marathon Petroleum, Chevron, Occidental Petroleum, and ConocoPhillips were the other top donors. 

  • ExxonMobil is notorious for its deceptive public relations marketing techniques that shape public perception of its products. ExxonMobil greenwashes its corporate image by embedding its company messaging in trusted sources to legitimize its narrative by association. For example, in 2022, ExxonMobil sponsored over 300 editions of Washington Post newsletters. ExxonMobil also ran advertisements through Bloomberg, The Economist, Financial Times, The New York Times, and Politico. 


    According to Clean Creatives’ F-List, ExxonMobil worked with Omnicom, Interpublic Group, and Edelman. In 2021, Exxon worked with Edelman on an ad campaign to oppose climate regulations.

  • ExxonMobil’s website states: “ExxonMobil acknowledges the risks of climate change and has long expressed support for the goals of the Paris Agreement… Our direct lobbying activities are aligned with limiting average global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius and include strong support for policies that will incentivize carbon emission reductions while providing the energy security the world needs.” 

    In 2023, ExxonMobil spent $6,840,000 on lobbying and used 69 lobbyists, 53 of whom were former congressional staff or members of Congress. 

    In 2022, Exxon reported spending between $25,000 and $50,000 on lobbying expenditures with the Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA), a trade association and lobbying group. In the past, WSPA has been exposed for setting up front groups to garner fake support for the oil industry. 

    In 2021, research into the fossil fuel lobbying ploys found ExxonMobil, Chevron, and the American Petroleum Institute to be the “world’s most obstructive” organizations. Ed Collins, a director at InfluenceMap, told the Guardian: “The corporate playbook for holding back climate policy has come a long way from science denialism but it is every bit as damaging… What we are seeing is not limited to efforts to undermine regulations directly. It also involves prolific and highly sophisticated narrative capture techniques, leading governments down incredibly dangerous paths.”

    In 2021, Greenpeace UK secretly recorded one of Exxon’s lobbyists describing the American Petroleum Institute as the “whipping boy” of the energy industry. In Greenpeace’s interview with Exxon’s Keith McCoy and Dan Easley, McCoy was recorded saying that Exxon was “playing defense” against Biden’s proposed American Jobs Plan. McCoy, who referenced being close to several pro-fossil fuel senators, also said that Exxon’s endorsement of the carbon tax through the Climate Leadership Council was an “advocacy tool” and a “great talking point.” Perhaps most damning, McCoy admitted to Greenpeace that Exxon has given money to “shadow groups” who lobby for climate denialism. Following the interview’s publication, McCoy was fired by Exxon. 


    Woods released a statement on behalf of Exxon in response to Greenpeace's publication, alleging that McCoy’s statements “in no way represent the company’s position” and that Exxon “stand[s] by our commitments to working on finding solutions to climate change. McCoy was then fired.

  • Davis Polk advised ExxonMobil on its acquisition of Pioneer Natural Resources in 2023. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher advised Pioneer Natural Resources on the $64.5 billion merger. Gibson Dunn is also arguing Exxon’s lawsuit against activist shareholders. Gibson Dunn was given an F on Law Students for Climate Accountability’s 2023 Climate Accountability Scorecard

    In 2020, law students led a campaign urging Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP to #DropExxon. Students from Harvard and Yale protested Paul, Weiss for its defense of ExxonMobil in a case about misleading investors about the costs of climate change. Paul, Weiss represented Exxon in San Fransico, Oakland, Baltimore, and Massachusetts in cases where these localities sought damages for climate change impacts caused by fossil fuel companies. 


    The “Litigation” section of ExxonMobil’s 2023 Annual Report states: “State and local governments and other entities in various jurisdictions across the United States and its territories have filed a number of legal proceedings against several oil and gas companies, including ExxonMobil, requesting unprecedented legal and equitable relief for various alleged injuries purportedly connected to climate change. These lawsuits assert a variety of novel, untested claims under statutory and common law. Additional such lawsuits may be filed. We believe the legal and factual theories set forth in these proceedings are meritless and represent an inappropriate attempt to use the court system to usurp the proper role of policymakers in addressing the societal challenges of climate change.”

  • ExxonMobil has been tied to multiple think tanks involved in climate denial. Between 1998 and 2014, Exxon spent over $30 million funding think tanks and policy institutes spreading climate denialism including the Heartland Institute, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Heritage Foundation, and other climate denial think tanks. According to the Global Center for Climate Justice, this helped make “the conservative climate change denial machine one of the most well-funded propaganda campaigns in history.” 


    ExxonMobil has also been called out for its donations to centrist think tanks. For example, since 2021, Exxon has donated $600,000 to Brookings and nearly $2.1 million to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). This raises alarm bells for conflict of interest, but Brookings and CSIS have said that Exxon’s financial support does not influence their climate and energy research.

  • ExxonMobil funds lobbying expenditures for grassroots, local, state, and federal organizations. In 2022, the top recipient was the American Petroleum Institute, which received between $7.5 and $9.99 million. The American Chemistry Council and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce each received between $1 and $2.49 million. The full list of ExxonMobil’s lobbying expenditures is listed here

    In January 2024, ExxonMobil withdrew from the Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA), a “trade group known for aggressively opposing government attempts to rein in the oil industry.” Exxon cited disagreement over climate policy as the reason for ending its membership with IPAA. While it is notable that Exxon left IPAA, it remains tied to other groups affiliated with IPAA, showing that Exxon is still complicit in opposing climate action. 

  • The ExxonMobil Foundation is the corporation’s primary philanthropic arm. The Foundation’s main focus areas are the fight against malaria, sustainability, and women’s economic opportunity. Upon clicking the “sustainability” focus area link, a “forward-looking statement warning” pops up with a long legal disclaimer that the statements on the page “are not guarantees of future corporate, market or industry performance or outcomes for society and are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control or are even unknown.” 

  • Darren Woods got his Bachelor of Science in electrical engineering from Texas A&M University. He was formerly a member of the Texas A&M University Engineering Advisory Council. Texas A&M awarded Woods the Outstanding Alumni Honor Award in 2023. 

  • Jay Hooley, another 2024 Climate Criminal, is the lead director of ExxonMobil. Hooley is also a board member of the insurance company Liberty Mutual. State Farm has also been directly invested in ExxonMobil in the past. In 2015, State Farm held 37 million shares of Exxon stock, making ExxonMobil State Farm’s third-largest investment.